How many sides is that, again?

UPDATE:  Thanks, Paul, and carlos morales!

ANOTHER UPDATE:  Wow, this one's getting some mileage!  Thanks to Garfield Ridge and Habitable Zone, too, neither of which I had heard of before.  The blogosphere, she is a wonderful thing.

YET ANOTHER UPDATE:  Thanks also to pwyll of Carnal Reason, who unsuccessfully tried to trackback here.

Also, please bless me, readers, for I have committed a serious blogospherical sin.  The cartoon is not my own, as I'm not that talented--I found it somewhere on the net, and for the life of me I can't remember where.  While I should have been careful enough to give credit at the time, I want to try to do so now, so if anyone knows from whence it came, please let me know.

I'm truly sorry for that.

Comments

[Rob]

Awsome. e=mc^2 vs magic. perfect. On one hand, hard verifiable observational science. On the other hand, alot of handwaving and superstition. Reminds me of "almost any rational hard science theory" vs evolution. It saddens me to see what "scientist" have done in the name of "science" vis. evolution. You know what the've done? They've created a new religion. (one that requires alot more faith than Christianity, that's for shizzle) A state-sponsored compulsory religion that we force upon our kids. Uhh, no thanks, count me out. Besides, most states aren't trying to introduce ID as a competing theory, they just want to present the scientific evidence that refutes evolution and let the kids research and decide. What is everyone afraid of? That kids will think for themselves and see the man behind the curtain? (you had to know I'd leave a comment.. :-} )